mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

January 31, 2006

You smell like a monkey...

Congrats are in order for Dr. James Joyner on the occasion of his third blogiversary. And many more, on channel four. And Scooby Doo, on channel two.

Posted by: Rusty at 12:11 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

First Jerusalem, Next Seville: Hamas Demands Return of Spain to Muslims

Central to the radical Islamist paradisical vision is the return of all land that once belonged to the global Caliphate to Muslims. In this vision, only when Muslims dominate the world can true peace be established.

Here is something that the blogfather, Charles Johnson found. Spain Herald:

The childrenÂ’s website Al Fateh, property of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, demands in its most recent issue the return of the Spanish city of Seville to the Â“lost paradiseÂ” of Al Andalus, as the Muslim part of Spain was called during its existence between 711 and 1492. The web magazine, whose name means Â“conqueror,Â” says it is for Â“the young builders of the future.Â”

UPDATE: Tammy Bruce chimes in with these words of wisdom:

Lovely. I wonder if Spain is confused by the fact that their abandoning the people of Iraq has done absolutely nothing to protect them from the Islamist ghouls.

Indeed.

Posted by: Rusty at 12:07 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Give these guys a brain and they would be dangerous! - Well - they are dangerous in a crazed deranged kinda way - but you get my point. Next stops Tours and maybe Vienna (one more try!). Lets not forget Sicily, parts of Southern Italy, Greece and all the Balkans! Nothing would shock the Europeans out of their post-WW2 purple haze lull better than a real nasty kick in the ass! Don't cry for the Europeans - they got a long nasty mean streak buried under their current "progressive" facade. They can handle themselves - eventually. And remember - alliances are fleeting - the Euros have spent far more time being our adversaries and competitors.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:34 PM (3aakz)

2 Oh for pete's sake!! What's it going to take to finally push these people off the map?!? They're slowly going to breed themselves into majority populations in every country so that they can take the world and make their own laws, duping everyone in the process with their "all we want is peace" trickery. I can just picture my descendants a thousand years from now, running for their lives in middle-America during some global Kristalnacht of non-Muslims. The end goal of this "religion of peace" is to kill all non-Muslims according to their very own book - why do we tolerate this crap? If they want to keep calling the West monsters, then lets show them some monsters.

Posted by: Ernie Oporto at January 31, 2006 01:45 PM (/lpvu)

3 I can't say I'm surprised, except that they took this long to come around to the subject. According to muslims, any land that they've ever set foot on indisputably belongs to them, so in their minds, they own the whole world except for possibly antarctica. Just another reason they should be exterminated in an orgy of multi-megaton goodness.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 01:48 PM (0yYS2)

4 They don't want to play kill or be killed with the US or any other nuclear armed country. They understand this, if they triggered that type of a fight it would be over in less than a day.

Posted by: Andre at January 31, 2006 04:48 PM (bQ3vG)

5 That's what they get for appeasing the 3/11 train bombers.

Posted by: Jamie at January 31, 2006 06:27 PM (c7+H7)

6 Exactly, Jamie, all you do when you show weakness is to encourage them. No act of kindness will satisfy these people, and force is the only language they understand.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 31, 2006 06:36 PM (rUyw4)

7 The only way to deal with muslims is to keep a boot on their neck if you're not going to kill them outright.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 07:24 PM (0yYS2)

8 Only way I'd put my size 13 boots on a Muslim neck is if the Muslim was face down in a mud puddle.

Posted by: Andre at January 31, 2006 11:11 PM (bQ3vG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Washington Post Goes Completely Off The Charts - Turns Total Dhimmi

Here is further commentary on Rusty's earlier post on the Washington Post's new role as supplier of material aid to a known terrorist organization: WaPo Sinks to New Lows: Terrorist Editorial

Today the WaPo provides a forum for a deported Hamas terrorist, Mousa Abu Marzook, to recite his propaganda talking points, in "What Hamas Is Seeking." What the author couches in words like "freedom and justice" has another meaning - the destruction of Israel. more...

Posted by: Richard@hyscience at 11:33 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 259 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Hating "Bush" is pushing the bushaters farther and farther out to the fringes. Honestly, it's funny to watch-- and scary at the same time.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 31, 2006 11:37 AM (8e/V4)

2 Desperate moves for desperate people. Didn't Forrest Gump say that? Weeping Jesus! It's going to take the detonation of a nuke by muslim terrorists on America soil to wake some of these fools up. How nice to be a designated terrorist group like hamas and be totally exempt from the war on terrorism.

Posted by: goesh at January 31, 2006 11:42 AM (vX0fY)

3 Ahem... Excuse me, but I must know. Is this a joke? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9184353144432289069 If not, wow...

Posted by: A Finn at January 31, 2006 11:57 AM (lGolT)

4 !Be careful what you ask for - you just might get it. Virtually everyone in Israel and the Palestinians are now scratching their heads tying to figure out - now what? Wish I was an arms dealer and had the popcorn concession. There's money to be made supplying both those fools - and a show to watch. God! Please! Now is the time for that asteroid hit - I'll email you the coordinates!

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:45 PM (3aakz)

5 A. Finn, The video link that you posted is to a Muslim - promoting site. If you want the real truth, go to: http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2006/01/are_muslims_lea.php Muslims are leaving Islam in droves - with data.

Posted by: Richard (Hyscience) at January 31, 2006 01:34 PM (a5WlC)

6 Trust a leftard dhimmi bitch like Finn to promote islam.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 01:49 PM (0yYS2)

7 Can't find it finn - what are you talking about?

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:55 PM (3aakz)

8 Finn is just a typical lefty Euro. He's too stupid to see what lives down the road from him and is soon to come calling. Calling you to prayers, Finn. Better start working on getting a callus on your forehead, the better to appear a true devotee.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 31, 2006 03:39 PM (rUyw4)

9 Hondo, the - is a minus mark, might be the reason. A must-see, shocking news, they are getting Texans as well.

Posted by: A Finn at February 02, 2006 04:36 AM (cWMi4)

10 And it's in Google, and Google is God, and God doesn't lie according to believers, but are they wrong, that I don't know. However, must trust everything Google, Google r second mightiest 1337commander of information and world after M1cr050f7.

Posted by: A Finn at February 02, 2006 04:44 AM (cWMi4)

11 qoal euopbm

Posted by: Ursula at February 27, 2006 07:28 PM (oDeG3)

12 mhaevgai maxdi

Posted by: Godfrey at March 02, 2006 11:32 PM (zvD2K)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

If Jessica Alba Was a Danish Free Speech Activist (Updated)

What would happen if instead of the global warming, Hollywood celebrities took on the cause of free speech in Denmark?

UPDATE: Remember, if you don't buy Danish the terrorists have already won!

Photoshop your own. Bonus points for any photoshop including Angelina Jolie.

Another update: I ask, Aaron delivers. If Angelina Jolie was a hot Danish free speech activist.

UPDATE: What if Nicole Ritchie was a free speech activist instead of a hasbeen socialite that never was? more...

Posted by: Rusty at 11:25 AM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 2 kb.

Alito Confirmed, 58-42

Samuel Alito has been confirmed by the Senate to sit on the Supreme Court.

Our friends way, way, way out on the Left are bitterly disappointed. They could use a laugh, and what's funnier than South Park? Feel free to console them with the Cartman quote from this post:

Cartman: Yes! Yesss!! Oh, let me taste your tears, Libs! Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:52 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Their reactions to this are better than water in the desert. They're holding a gun to their own collective head and threatening to pull the trigger. I just want a cold beer, some pork rinds, and a recliner while I watch the show.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 11:11 AM (0yYS2)

2 What's an Alito and how does this help me win Jessica Alba's heart?

Posted by: Rusty at January 31, 2006 11:30 AM (JQjhA)

3 I enjoyed reading some of the liberal tirades. As to be expected, many got off on a Bush tangent. One got to ranting about Iraq and said Bush was exposing the troops to bird flu in Iraq!! Ha ha ha!

Posted by: goesh at January 31, 2006 11:37 AM (vX0fY)

4 Liberal tears of anguish are like tasty droplets of love honey. Yum! I can't get enough of it. Click over to Kos and watch them gnash their teeth. It's pure enjoyment.

Posted by: dcb at January 31, 2006 11:40 AM (8e/V4)

5 Rusty, is it really Jessica's heart you want to get into?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 31, 2006 12:00 PM (RHG+K)

6 58-42 final score - a solid win! I was a bit overly optimistic at 72-28, but that's OK. Again, indicates not the strength of Bush as much as indicating the weakness of the Dem Left. I take additional solice in the pre-vote of 72-25. Bush/Conservatism is holding its own with modest gains evident. The Left however is clearly taking a beating and continues to slide. Everything the Left's been up to and pushing these last several months, I've welcomed! I can see a losing strategy a mile away. I am an optimistic and happy guy - I know the road to success consists of 2 steps forward - 1 sideways - fall down - stagger - stagger - continue on. Now the Left on the otherhand ... give them an ice cream cone and they will smash it into their forehead - and then tell you how good it tastes.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:22 PM (3aakz)

7 Actually, someone I read made a good point: the 58-42 vote could actually be good for us. The Left will be screaming "Only 58? We could have succeeded with a filibuster!" and another purge begins. My Dark Master Rove is well pleased....

Posted by: Brian B at January 31, 2006 12:59 PM (rGfpg)

8 After having taking years of stinging from the Left, it is with the utmost pleasure that I enjoy their gnashing of the teeth and pulling of the hair. I suppose the thing that strikes me as the oddest of all is how serious the Left takes itself. Their allies in the NYT write one of the dumbest columns ever, coming out in support of Hamas, and they expect to be taken seriously. The Left is totally bankrupt.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 31, 2006 03:53 PM (rUyw4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Muslims Still On Cartoon Rage (Updated)

151564_large.jpeg.jpeg.jpg Only in Muslim-land can you find a theological equivalant of Walt Disney's theme parks - a screaming cascade of rollercoaster events stemming from a common theme, in this case, rage over a simple series of cartoons depicting the Muslim's "prophet" Muhammad (emphasis on the mad is most intentional). Interestingly, members of Denmark's "moderate" Muslim community say they are reluctant to speak out with critical observations of their religion, fearing social isolation, threats and violence, as we are continuing to witness world wide over a series of cartoons. It's almost hard to believe that these people are adults.

As our regular readers will have already seen here, here, here, here, and here, this story has been taking on a life of it's on for some time now, and it appears that Islam-aficionados are going to continue trying to milk this cow until it's beyond being all dried out and long gone to market.

Now, from Robert Spencer we have yet another cartoon rage update in which Spencer writes that he is amazed that this story never seems to die, although I rather doubt that he is really surprised since we have all come to expect almost anything from Islam-aficionados. He says that these twelve cartoons could end up being the Gavrilo Princip of 2006.

Muslims want us all to believe that their Muhammad is so special that no image can be made of him. For many if not most non-Muslims, the only thing special about Muhammad is that he serves as the wellspring of world wide terrorism that began long before 9/11, and is showing signs of never ending. Islamists call it simply, jihad. more...

Posted by: Richard@hyscience at 09:40 AM | Comments (48) | Add Comment
Post contains 472 words, total size 4 kb.

1 But still doesn't compare to "Pat Robertson."

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 31, 2006 10:09 AM (8e/V4)

2 Pat Robertson doesn't qualify as an adult! Robertson is an embarrassment to the Christian faith, even though you really can't compare his statements to jihadis calling for death threats and outrage over a damned cartoon.

Posted by: Richard at January 31, 2006 10:13 AM (ENIEZ)

3 It's kind of funny they get so upset, because I don't think the cartoons really look that much like Muhammed. If I took a picture of a frog, and put the word "Muhammed" in the caption, would that too trigger global jihad?

Posted by: AbbaGav at January 31, 2006 10:16 AM (5XR09)

4 Mohammed was a paranoid, delusional, murderous psychopath who liked to molest little kids. Bring on the fatwas biyotches.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:29 AM (0yYS2)

5 Actually Smiling Mo really digs Denmark. He's urging everyone to buy Danish goods. I Am Muhammad. Denmark Rocks!

Posted by: Thomas the Wraith at January 31, 2006 09:37 PM (zTWhc)

6 before talking about Islam &the prophet peace be upon him I kindly invite you to read about his life and his great message to mankind pls dont ignore or sarcattic my invitation

Posted by: mohammed at February 01, 2006 12:26 AM (OX4Lc)

7 Hey Mohammed, some of us here HAVE read about the life of your murderous, child-raping prophet (Pigs Be Upon Him) Time to go out and buy lots of Danish ham!!! Go Denmark!!!!!!!

Posted by: Pagan Gurl at February 01, 2006 07:51 AM (wJMtO)

8 Fuck Denmark. Bastards! Stop all this shitty fuck.

Posted by: Your Daddy at February 01, 2006 05:39 PM (VsW4Z)

9 fuck all of you motherfuckers who talk shit about shit you don't know FUCK YOU ALL MOTHERFUCKERS

Posted by: the dude who fucked your sister at February 02, 2006 08:00 PM (ikYsl)

10 HEY MOTHERFUCKERS, FUCK YOU FUCK YOU ALL FUCK YOU ALL FUCK YOU ALL FUCK YOU ALL FUCK YOU ALL FUCK YOU ALL I AM THE DUDE WHO FUCKED YOUR SISTER YOU FUCKING MOTHERFUCKER

Posted by: the dude who fuck you in the ass at February 02, 2006 08:05 PM (ikYsl)

11 All of you, don't you have more important things to worry about?

Posted by: Sultan at February 03, 2006 01:54 AM (nUGXB)

12 Dont b daft mate, Muslims are cool, peace loving people. As oppossed to Zionist and Nazis and Facists. Muslim gonna take over the whole fuckin world just u see. Then the Zionist dogs gonna unleash the Samson option and take us all out... in 666 days time. For more info on this, stick your head up your ass and suck. byebye

Posted by: mark at February 03, 2006 07:22 AM (5Bxgh)

13 ISLAM is the religion of peace. AND every person, who is responsible of terrorism and offensive activities in the world is extracted from ISLAM.

Posted by: Sajid at February 03, 2006 12:30 PM (EonKJ)

14 Jesus Christ Matthew 7 3"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. 15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 1st john When you see 'the abomination that causes desolation'[a]standing where it does not belongÂ—let the reader understandÂ—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.

Posted by: Howie at February 03, 2006 12:48 PM (D3+20)

15 According to ISLAM, Muslims are not allowed to insult other religions and people of this world.Muslims are restricted to say bad words for others, beating/killing innocents. As I've read this thread, most of protestors agains Mohammad's (P.B.U.H) cartoons, are abusing, using bad words for cartoonists and others.....so my dear Are you really Muslim? or insulting your own ISLAM by abusing?

Posted by: Sajid at February 03, 2006 12:48 PM (EonKJ)

16 Will someone please explain to my humble mind just what the hell Sajid just said?????

Posted by: Richard at February 03, 2006 01:26 PM (ENIEZ)

17 I think she just called the above posters apostates.

Posted by: Howie at February 03, 2006 01:42 PM (D3+20)

18 As I've said earlier, "Try to remember, this is all because of cartoons, c-a-r-t-o-o-n-s - societal upheaval over 12 silly cartoons !!!" "And these people want us to be like them? Live under their Islamic laws? You've got to be kidding. Why should modern, sane, normal human beings don robes and head scarfs, and live in a sand dune mentality?" "... the rioting Muslims are culturally, sociologically, and psychologically, still living in the Middle Ages, Islam having failed to reform itself since it's inception. Secondly, and equally an important factor, "The culture war that is being waged by the Arabs and Muslims in response to the Danish cartoons is an assault on the West's right to live and govern in accordance with its values. It is an assault on the notions of freedom and self-determination themselves." Furthermore, "The Muslims pushing the issue believe that non-Muslims ought to behave obsequiously towards all things Islamic, while the Muslims are free to demonize Jews as monkeys and pigs and accuse Christians of being idolaters. According to the rules of their culture war, if Western societies refuse to behave in accordance with their dictates, the Muslims have the right and duty to attack them." In short - nuts to the commenter and all of his/her friends!

Posted by: Richard at February 03, 2006 02:09 PM (ENIEZ)

19 Fact. Muslims are not Terrorist But all Terrorist are Muslims.

Posted by: Triple Tree at February 04, 2006 02:37 AM (HbFYT)

20 This is totally pathetic over some silly cartoons,these fuckers get right up my nose,there are more muslims in the uk than any other fuckin country and we gotta put up with this? Scotland allready has 500 000 muslims not inc asylum seekers and another 100 000 on there way & this is how the black bastards show there appreciation,im not reallly racist,infact im not racist at all it just all fuckin bugs me,i like what mark had to say...they are taking over the world. i have a cousin who on many occasions gets called white boy by his paki friend,now its not classed as racist for a black boy to call someone white boy but it is racist for a white person to call someone black boy. what the fuck? so next week in london we are expecting 20 000 protesters,what do the want? i think they sould just shoot em all gun the fuckers down and send the rest of them back to there own god damn countries!

Posted by: STEPHEN FROM SCOTLAND at February 04, 2006 12:03 PM (FhX1m)

21 first of all i must say the one who drew this cartoons wish i cod fuck his mother n sis and i warn every one of u infront of your monitors .. any of you have guys tell me your addres i will be there an GONNA tell you how we MUSLIMS do when it comes to our religion n our PROPHET P.B.U.H ... and that guy damn he is going to hell on the earth .. SHOOT @ SIGHT .. i m going to do to him ..

Posted by: Munawar at February 04, 2006 12:22 PM (mSTLc)

22 Munawar, go fuck yourself. Empty threats. And I'll be happy to meet you, mother fucker, you just tell me when and where. I'll gut you like the pig you are!

Posted by: Crusader knight at February 05, 2006 01:41 AM (rUyw4)

23 Hey u fuckers, We muslims are going to kick the shit out of u guys. We are already burning your buildings. Just u see. hahahahahahaha

Posted by: s at February 05, 2006 04:39 AM (wRk3l)

24 Your right my brother. All muslims around the world especially in europe and asia are fucking these danish/french/german bastards. MUSLIMS RULE!!!!!!

Posted by: jj at February 05, 2006 04:42 AM (wRk3l)

25 yeah,thats right, go on show us somemore of that terrorist shit.Only serves to prove to rest of the world what you truly are

Posted by: CHI ROH at February 05, 2006 05:57 AM (j163a)

26 Its terrible to see danish buildings on fire. Total outrage. We all know that Muslims will always be treated different from non muslims so lets stop this shit.. Muslims are not terrorist.

Posted by: world at February 05, 2006 08:08 AM (wRk3l)

27 It's funny when people talk about stuff they know nothing about. Instead of insulting our prophet and our religion,get a life! ...and believe me when i say: YOU WILL ALL BURN IN HELL !!!!!!!!!!! Faithful Muslim

Posted by: Faithful Muslim at February 05, 2006 11:12 AM (R7XQm)

28 Looks like Sajid is the only person here that makes any sense. Richard has some good points as well.

Posted by: Ghede at February 05, 2006 06:57 PM (SE9g+)

29 Muslims are stinking, retarded & barbaric terrorists! You will always be despised and discriminated...muahahahahahhaha! Kill all Muslisms!

Posted by: IslamStinks at February 06, 2006 03:06 PM (OF80t)

30 Alrite...let's get one thing straight: Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims. So much for the teaching of the Prophet More-harm-mad.

Posted by: Peace at February 06, 2006 03:11 PM (OF80t)

31 You know what irks me? Some people out there in cyberspace write their thoughts on websites and pass them off as truths. Before you write that Muslims don't want their precious Mohammad depicted, learn the facts. Muslims don't accept depictions of ANY prophets and religious figures-- this includes Moses and Jesus (both of which are respected and revered by Muslims). Don't spread hatered. You're just as bad as the terrorists themselves. I mean, think about it-- it's not okay for Muslims to hate westerners, but it's ok for westerners to hate Muslims? Hmm...

Posted by: Your ignorance amazes me at February 06, 2006 08:53 PM (tLEaB)

32 This whole circus over some cartoons plus previous acts of terror in Spain & London should serve as a wake-up call to the liberal Europeans. You should realize by now that your sincerity and kindness in accepting these seemingly harmless Muslim immigrants (from Middle East and Northen Africa)is construed not as goodwill but rather your weakness and vulnerability. When are we Westerners ever going to learn??? You cannot expect the Muslims to appreciate what we do for them... Ask yourself, how much have these Muslim immigrants contributed (besides hooliganism in your country compared to other immigrants? Take a good look at France in light of the recent rioting... Be forewarned: the Muslims are not peacelovers like they claimed to be. While not all Muslims are violent, most of them are (and can be influenced) to be violent. What kind of parents would allow their kids to be brainwashed to wear a belt of C4 and detonate it in a crowd of innocents? This is only the first wave of Muslim terror and violence. We need to wake up and stop them NOW! For starters, those who do not pledge allegiance to their adopted homeland should be deported...period!

Posted by: Time to wake up! at February 07, 2006 01:53 PM (OF80t)

33 I live in turkey and I am also a muslim but I have not seen this cartoons yet for this reason saying something abouth this situation might be foolish.I want to see this cartoons. Can anybody help me to reach this cartoons. Thanks Mehmet

Posted by: Mehmet at February 08, 2006 12:39 PM (APwEp)

34 I would like to extend my thanks to one of the few people who managed to make an intelligent coherent comment on this site, without mindlessly using profanity. Very well said on the part of "Your ignorance amazes me" for being on of the only people to talk of tolerelernce in his/her message. You correctly pointed out that while it's not okay for Muslims to hate Westerners, The saying goes both ways. I also commend you for pointing out that Muslims don't accept images of Moses and Jesus as well. You seem like a very itteligent person, you speak like an adult,(unlike most of these other people) how old are you? If you can would you be able to respond to the e-mail address I have provide? Thank you very much for your insight.

Posted by: Casey at February 09, 2006 02:54 PM (flhYe)

35 This is for "Time to wake up". Were did you come up with this garbage. I have been in Iraq,Kuwait,Qutar,the EAE, Egypt and Afghanistan. and from what have seen and expericenced. you are completley wrong. Yes, Europe did underestimate the Islamo-extermist, I agree. However, for you to say that most muslims are violent or can be compelled to be is just plain ignorant. But to be fair, I will ask, How many times have you traveled to the Mid-East?, How many Muslims have you met? How many lies can you make up before you feel guilty. I will wait for your response. As for the rest of the ignorant ones, I chose not to respond to yours because most of you could not make it through a sentence w/o dropping the F bomb.That goes for both muslims and non-muslims posting comments.

Posted by: Casey at February 09, 2006 03:05 PM (flhYe)

36 Casey: So are you saying that all Muslims are peace-loving citizens of the world who do not indulge in violence in any way or form? You are just as blind as the left-wing liberals in the US like Diane Feinstein and Hilary Clinton. Your very ignorance is a complete dishonor and insult to those who perished in 9/11 as well as those innocents who were beheaded by Al Qaeda. And you call all these a lie? Sure...blame Bush for 9/11 along with everything else. To me, your sympathy towards the Islamo-facists & terrorrists make you a worst scum & garbage then the terrorists themselves.

Posted by: Time to wake up! at February 09, 2006 04:16 PM (OF80t)

37 To those of you who are still not convinced of what the Islamic terrorists are capable off (Casey included), check out the videos and pictures on this website. Don't say didn't warn you, this site has some pretty graphic and disgusting videos/pictures (including the recording of several beheadings by the "peace-loving" Al Qaeda: http://www.michaelsavage.com

Posted by: Time to wake up! at February 09, 2006 06:25 PM (OF80t)

38 Why don't you take your Mohammed and shove him up your ass. You IslamÂ’s oppress your women and your justification is to get virgins? You can all eat shit. Muslims will NEVER take over the world. We would drop a nuke on your forehead before that would ever happen. People donÂ’t want to admit it but itÂ’s true. Have you even noticed that Â“IslamÂ” is mostly in 3rd world countries? Maybe its more than a coincidence? You guys wear rags on your head and robes in the middle of the fucking desert. How stupid is that. Shave your face and buy some shorts, t-shirts and some sandals. Keep the do rag if you want. Your religion is silly so go fuck yourself dune coons. By the way, IÂ’m it may sound racist, thatÂ’s because it is and the Â“normalÂ” world is tired of your shit. YouÂ’ll get your eventually, maybe by an accidental car bomb victim or something. So you go live in your shitty world in fear and teach your kids to shoot people. Yea, thatÂ’s real civilized.

Posted by: towel head killer at February 10, 2006 01:09 PM (lihsI)

39 Time to wake up: First, letÂ’s get one thing straight: I never say all in any of my comments, there are exceptions, always people who murder, regardless of race or religion. There is not one type of people on earth that donÂ’t have their fair share of evil. As for being a liberal, having sympathy towards terrorist, and blaming President Bush for 9/11. Let me enlighten you.I am a Sgt in the United States Army, I watch Fox News, I voted for President Bush in the last election because I trust in him in as a Commander in Chief, I would refuse to vote before I voted for Hilary Clinton. I have been shot at, seen children blown up, had my vehicle hit by an RPG, and watched one of my best friends die. What experince do you have at kicking down a door and seening a murderer with a bomb straped to him blow himself up? I've seen enough murderous terrorist for one life time. However, I have seen the everyday Muslim, trying to go about their daily lives and just raise a family, the majority of them are just that. But I guess since IÂ’m in the Army that makes me hate America and sympathetic to the Islamo-facists who want to destroy the United States of America. I as an American Soldier am Â“worse scum & garbage than the terrorists themselves. Because I defend, along with the rest of the military, defend your right to say what you want. Even though you are completely talking of youÂ’re a@#. I have had Iraqi Muslims come up and thank me for helping them. They have given me what little food they have because they appreciate us helping them. DonÂ’t expect you to know a lot about that. They hate, as much as I do, these barbaric animals that want them to live in a constant reign of terror, and kill innocent human beings with absolutely no reason and use Islam as an excuse. But maybe you would have realized that since my e-mail address ends in .mil (means military) you might have thought a little bit more about what you were going to say. Oh yeah, just so you know. Clinton had 6 years to prevent 9/11. Pres. Bush had 7 months. Hmm wonder whose had more time to do more? P.S. you can also respond to my e-mail address if you want to continue this conversation. What Say you? Casey Atwa SGT US Army. Army National Guard

Posted by: Casey at February 10, 2006 02:27 PM (flhYe)

40 hmm.. cant us muslims stop saying bad words!! atleast not infront of...them *BEEP*! this!

Posted by: motaz at February 10, 2006 02:32 PM (fHdDQ)

41 At least "Time to wake up" makes coherent sentences and makes an attemp to use consistent talking points.He/she actually makes a good point about far left liberals. Unlike "Towel head Killer." Wise up sir/ma'am, you sound just as hateful and stupid as "munawar","jj","s","Islamstinks","Crusader Knight" Casey

Posted by: Casey at February 10, 2006 02:47 PM (flhYe)

42 At least "Time to wake up" makes coherent sentences and makes an attempt to use consistent talking points.He/she actually makes a good point about far left liberals. Unlike "Towel head Killer." Wise up sir/ma'am, you sound just as hateful and stupid as "munawar","jj","s","Islamstinks","Crusader Knight" Casey

Posted by: Casey at February 10, 2006 02:47 PM (flhYe)

43 There is nothing wrong with these cartoons other than that they are offensive. Since when has it been ok to murder, torture and behead because you were offended? If someone would literally want to kill me over some stupid cartoon...they must have some kind of mental flaw. I'm a free man and shouldn't have to fear ignorant extremist violence simply because I freely chose to express myself, views and opinions. I'm fully aware that 90 percent of all Muslims are good, friendly people but, it's this other 10 percent that truly need to go for the advancement of the free world. I find it offensive that I'm expected to not offend someone by posting a stupid cartoon. Do you find me out there using this as a lame excuse to riot, torture and murder? All this is a farse used by those who would torture and kill no matter what cartoon was published. Nothing but simple criminals. Respectfully, John http://johnanderson75.blogspot.com

Posted by: John at February 12, 2006 01:04 PM (8q9BI)

44 i am a muslim, denmark suckz! stop this bullshit or i will bumb ur whole country down! understand?

Posted by: your fukn denmark's bitch at February 15, 2006 06:39 AM (NHJ0o)

45 i have a message to tell the danish people, go fuck your cows mother fuckers, i enjoy watching your economy going down. the best danish suck a donkey's dick. fuck all of you.

Posted by: fuck dinmark at February 21, 2006 09:53 PM (VyEoS)

46 Almost all religions have gone through similar zealous phases, since islam is relatively new and the development of global consiousness and tolerance in western societies have only really been seen this last decade; i think Islam will probably calm down in a few hundred years. Lets not forget, these are only protests, entire inquisitions condoning mass torture and murder occured in the name of christianity

Posted by: aye at February 23, 2006 05:53 PM (3nb8+)

47 not decade, centuary! (forgive my shitty grammar, its 3 in the morn)

Posted by: aye at February 23, 2006 05:54 PM (3nb8+)

48 SHOW YOUR SUPPORT FOR DENMARK!!!! Defend FREEDOM! Those who comment here who would literally want to hurt someone or hate someone because of these stupid cartoons are the true enemy of the world. You guys kind of remind me of the spoiled rich kid who has no tolerance for someone who they think are lower class! I would actually like some of these extremists to visit my blog and debate a few things where anything goes. And by the way, I don't believe in Christianity either! All relgion is the work of SATAN! I think of the bible just as I do the Quaran - both are works of fiction written by kings and queens to control the masses and make money off of. Respectfully, John

Posted by: John at February 25, 2006 12:23 PM (8q9BI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Maybe, but at least he's a loveable Nazi

Did I ever tell you that my guardian angel always appears to me in the form of Colonel Klink? It's true. So if you're going to be compared to a Nazi prison guard, you could do no worse than Klink.

Okay, maybe Schultz would be better. But Klink is a close second.

Colonel Klink, why hast thou forsaken me!

Posted by: Rusty at 09:16 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I wonder how a guy like Murtha could stand to serve with this woman if she were to win a house seat with a campaign that replaced her opponentÂ’s Marine uniform with a Luftwaffe uniform. Even he must be repelled by this kind of thing. AndÂ…. In what must have been the first victory for the PC police, Sgt. Kinchlo (a black American Prisoner.) would dress up as a German soldier when going out on sabotage missions. Man, those Krauts were dumb.

Posted by: Brad at January 31, 2006 10:01 AM (BJYNn)

2 Coleen Rowley has now apologized for the photo...she blames a bumbling volunteer named Carter. She said she tried to contact Kline's office to apologize, but the radio hidden in her coffee pot wasn't working.

Posted by: Duane at January 31, 2006 10:51 AM (bUHuL)

3 Here via Michelle Malkin... I have to take issue with your characterization of Klink as lovable. You're not supposed to like Klink... granted, he's not as despicable as Hochstetter, but there's a reason he always loses (at Werner Klemperer's insistence). Schultz *is* lovable, but he's a toymaker, not a Nazi ("Me, an enemy? I'm just as loyal a German soldier as any prisoner here in this room!"). However, I would think that characterizing an opponent as Klink would label him as much incompetent as a Nazi. It's still unfair, though. Brad: Thing is, Kinch almost always wore a mask and gloves when he went out in a German uniform. The only ep where I can remember that he didn't was "The Witness," and Hogan made sure to hide him when Hochstetter came along. So they weren't *that* dumb.

Posted by: Mama Bear at January 31, 2006 10:53 AM (NQM7T)

4 Mama Bear, I know, but there was this Simpsons episode... Anyway, I sometimes mix up what happened to Homer with my own life.

Posted by: Rusty at January 31, 2006 10:55 AM (JQjhA)

5 Regarding Murtha, who says he's appalled? He may have been a troop supporter, but he doesn't seem to be now.

Posted by: ScottG at January 31, 2006 12:19 PM (Dxc5X)

6 fwiw, Col. Klink was not a Nazi. Colonel Klink was a member of the Wehrmacht. And, as I recall, not a fan of either Hitler or of the Gestapo Major Hochstetter. My only point being that the person at the campaign screwed up and screwed up screwing up. They fired and sentenced to watch Stalag 17 seven times straight.

Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 31, 2006 01:12 PM (wbQhK)

7 Crowley will lose! Please Dems! I want more altered photos of US Marine uniforms - I love the Nazi subconscious message! Its a real winner with Mainstream America! Now, what exactly is Crowley's claim to fame? Oh yeah! I remember! She coulda, woulda, shoulda saved America if it wasn't for those (who exactly?) that stopped her! And the fact her Wonder Woman outfit was at the dry cleaners.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:23 PM (3aakz)

8 In her "apology" she readily admits that "This was a Nazi uniform and I didn't grasp that impact..." and then more gibberish about feelings, unaware of the difference caused by her actions and feelings. Unaware seems to be her platform, so since that fits with the current Demodummy mindset, she gets high marks for consistency.

Posted by: forest hunter at January 31, 2006 06:36 PM (Fq6zR)

9 Klein! Hang on to that photo! The subliminal message is clear! US Marines = NAZIS. I don't give a damn how the Dems try to reinterpret this screwup for the electorate - it ain't gonna work - make it work for you! Wow! Crowley really knows how to pick her staff - they sure know how to reachout to the heartland of America!

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 09:30 PM (3aakz)

10 woeb beif

Posted by: Griffin at March 02, 2006 11:33 PM (fa4CO)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

More Terror Threats Against Denmark, Norway

Islam is the only prominent world-wide religion which still adheres to the notion that blasphemy ought to be a criminal act. Worse, many Muslims, following the lead of Muhammed himself, advocate the death penalty as punishment.

A few days ago we brought you the news that the Glory Brigades in Northern Europe had threatened suicide attacks against Denmark. Today, word from friend of The Jawa Report Evan Kohlmann that the Mujahideen Army in Iraq has threatened Danish and Norwegian interests.

Settling for [merely] boycotting these cowards is a position of weakness that is indicative of a feeble nation that does not stand up in defense of its Prophet and the principles that it believes in. They started [the battle] and they should suffer its consequences. We call upon all our brigades in the Mujahideen Army to attack whatever they possibly can in these two countries specifically, and in other countries who repeat what they have doneÂ… Let us make our own efforts on top of AllahÂ’s expected revengeÂ—and hopefully, Allah will choose us to be among those who seek revenge for Mohammed in his name, as this in itself is a great honor for a Muslim.Â”

Oh, that religion of peace.

The full translation can be found at Evan's Global Terror Alert.

UPDATE: Two employees of Danish company beaten in Saudi Arabia. Tolerance is Islam's middle name.

UPDATE II: Why we should support Denmark. (Except Brigitte Nielson)

Posted by: Rusty at 08:36 AM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 245 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Oh, you're just being "naive". You don't really believe these threats should be taken seriously, do you?

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 31, 2006 08:42 AM (8e/V4)

2 I got one, if you follow Islam... OFF WITH YOUR HEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Andre at January 31, 2006 08:43 AM (bQ3vG)

3 They forgot to put (pbuh) after Mohammed's name. I expect a fatwa against them to be forthcoming soon ...

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 09:04 AM (5pqct)

4 I'm glad I no longer have to rant about the evils of islam since the worldwide muslim community is doing everything they can to show the civilized people of the world exactly what kind of primitive savages they are. Even the oh so tolerant Euroleftards won't be able to justify their position of appeasement much longer, because even the gutless french are starting to realize that you can't appease a rabid dog, you can only kill it.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 09:19 AM (0yYS2)

5 i just think it is natural that one feels hurted as u abuse him or mock at him 4 any porpuse so muslims al over the world have every legal rigth 2 protect as see their prophet mocked at u gotta be realistic my freind this is uncivilised act of terrorism u just wnn inflame us look at it u cn enjoy ur freedom of expression press and wt ever u cll it but dont attack us thanks

Posted by: barnoma at January 31, 2006 10:11 AM (FXmiH)

6 Islam has certainly out paced all others to officially become the whiniest segment of society, forever complaining about the persecution committed against them by everyone else while they're out catching butterflies and writing poetry. A more appropriate name for the religion would be: Denial.

Posted by: Graeme at January 31, 2006 10:17 AM (75o7S)

7 So tell me, barnoma, someone makes fun of your prophet and Muslims have a right to kill them for it? Is that what you're saying?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 10:22 AM (5pqct)

8 I think I just had a seizure trying to read barnoma's post.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:30 AM (0yYS2)

9 >>>look at it u cn enjoy ur freedom of expression press and wt ever u cll it but dont attack us barnoma, We don't accept the premise that muslims on the other side of the planet can tell us what we are allowed to say, or do in our own countries. Why should we? You do as you please in your country, we'll do as we please in ours. It's that simple. See, you persecute and regularly kill christians in your muslim countries-- just because they converted to christianity. And you're obviously not going to stop doing this just because we ask you to. Yet you feel you have a right to make silly demands of us about silly cartoons in some distant European country? You people are truly insane. The day is coming when our only alternative will be to place a total blockade on your countries. Nobody goes in or out of any muslim country. You are dangerous people. Total global pariahs.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 31, 2006 11:03 AM (8e/V4)

10 Q: What's the difference between a roadkilled skunk and a roadkilled muslim? A: Skidmarks in front of the skunk, and the muslim can be smelled from farther away.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 11:13 AM (0yYS2)

11 FUCK MOHAMMED THE PEDOPHILE !!!!!!!!

Posted by: Dr.R. Clavan at January 31, 2006 01:32 PM (lBwMA)

12 Muslims seem to have this really odd talent to alienate EVERYBODY! Hindus, Budhists, Christians, animalists, the list goes on. Scratch a secularist or atheist deep enough, and you will find they too get creeped out by them! So muslims! Keep up the good work! We may yet live to see the day when the world (or at least 5/6 of it) is truly united around something!

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:37 PM (3aakz)

13 Hell you don't have to scratch me, and I'm an ultra-orthodox atheist.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 09:28 PM (0yYS2)

14 Fuck all who hates Islam and prophet Muhammad -- Aleyh Salat wa as salam --

Posted by: Abdulhadi at February 05, 2006 09:48 AM (IpuE8)

15 Istaghfar allah! u idiots danish son of the bitches... do u pray from goats or cows like you ?! ... Israel did 9/11 dam it

Posted by: Abdulhadi8E at February 05, 2006 09:58 AM (IpuE8)

16 ... HaHa losersss danish companies are losing 200 million dollars/day because brave muslims dont buy shit things from denmark

Posted by: Anti-Denmark(Abdulhadi8E) at February 05, 2006 10:02 AM (IpuE8)

17 Any Cow here can remind me... What danish people are doing in my MUSLIM COUNTRY??? I remembered something I saw danish old guy washing my car.LOL,,, I should put caricature about that,, Any Italian will help me ?

Posted by: Muslims-4-God(Abdulhadi8E) at February 05, 2006 10:09 AM (IpuE8)

18 Haha....Muslim pigs must now leave West, or your fate will not be good. You remember what happened to you here in Malta, we killed all of you. You hate West, you must leave. Many in West wake up and see you for pigs you are...animals that need to be sent back to your dirty deserts.

Posted by: Crusader knight of Malta at February 05, 2006 11:13 PM (rUyw4)

19 Of all the crap in the world in which a foreign newspaper could have drawn about and filled its empty page, IT HAD TO CHOOSE THE MOCKING OF RELIGION!!! they were looking for trouble...can't blame you Muslims...I say: do whatever you have to do to get your rights back, even if it means that you have to KILL.

Posted by: Muslims have the right to do this at February 17, 2006 12:44 PM (IpuE8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Men Want Jessica Alba

Jessica-Alba Usually, public opinion polls are disputable. I think this one has merit because it's what Mom would want for her son also.

From BostonHerald.com:

"Fantastic Four" gal Jessica Alba is the woman most men want to bring home to meet Mom, according to AskMen.com.
Jess is "long-term relationship material," according to the Web site's 2.5 million readers and staff surveyed for the annual Top 99 List.

Angelina Jolie was a runner-up and, oddly, Britney Spears didn't even make the list. Also, no veiled ROPMA women were in the Top 99 List. Imagine that.

Companion post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 08:28 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.

WaPo Sinks to New Lows: Terrorist Editorial

Hamas is recognized as a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department. Nevertheless, the Washington Post feels it appropriate to let a convicted Hamas terrorist editorialize in their pages. Isn't there something in the USA Patriot Act against giving material support to terrorists? Isn't giving them free advertising material support?

Mousa Abu Marzook in the Washington Post:

A new era in the struggle for Palestinian liberation is upon us. Through historic fair and free elections, the Palestinian people have spoken.

Yes, they have, and what they have said is 'we hate J-O-Os'.

Accordingly, America's long-standing tradition of supporting the oppressed's rights to self-determination should not waver.

No it should not. We should support the tiny liberal democracy of Israel which is surrounded and oppressed by a billion Muslims eager to drive them into the sea.

The United States, the European Union and the rest of the world should welcome the unfolding of the democratic process, and the commitment to aid should not falter. Last week's victory of the Change and Reform Party in the Palestinian legislative elections signals a new hope for an occupied people.

New hope? Oh, yes, "We really hope that the final solution will finally be implemented correctly."But here is the choicest part

Our society has always celebrated pluralism in keeping with the unique history and traditions of the Holy Land. In recognizing Judeo-Christian traditions, Muslims nobly vie for and have the greatest incentive and stake in preserving the Holy Land for all three Abrahamic faiths.

Right. Is this the same Hamas which has vowed to drive the Jews into the sea? Is this the same Hamas that makes it impossible for Jews to live in the West Bank or Gaza, both of which have become Jew-free zones? Is this the same Hamas that has vowed to implement Iranian style sharia law? Is this the same Hamas that has been terrorizing Arab Christians for decades?

Whether or not Hamas gets rid of corruption in the Palestinian Authority is a secondary concern. Populist movements are often shouldered under the auspices of 'reform'. A 'transparent' PA which supports terrorism is no prize to the civilized society.

Give me a corrupt PA that doesn't support terrorism over a clean PA that does, any day.

Via Captain Ed who has more.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:25 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.

If Ted Kennedy Was in Animal House....

...as Bluto Blutarsky.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:06 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

Kos Kids Reaction to Failed Alito Filibuster

THIS is how it happened in Nazi Germany, Its over.

More.

UPDATE: I'm registering Independent tomorrow. You're welcome to join me.

Even more.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:03 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

Iran Will Face UN Security Council

The five permanent Security Council members have directed the International Atomic Energy Agency to remand Iran's case to them. From Reuters:

The foreign ministers from China, Russia, the United States, France and Britain as well as Germany and the European Union, said after a dinner in London that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must decide to bring Iran's case before the Council when the agency meets on Thursday in Vienna.
A senior U.S. official said the statement meant Russia and China were now on board with the United States and the European powers that there must be strong action taken by the IAEA in Vienna to discourage Tehran from pursuing atomic research which could enable the country to build a nuclear bomb.
"This is the most powerful message we could have hoped for," said a senior U.S. official, who said the discussions over dinner had been animated.

Not, of course, that anything's going to happen right away:

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the ministers shared serious concerns about Iran's nuclear programs and agreed that an extensive period of "confidence-building" was required from Iran.
The Council could ultimately impose sanctions against Iran but there are many steps before this could happen.

The question is, how will Ahmanidejad and the mullahs react? And will the UN be any better at enforcing its edicts than it was with Saddam Hussein?

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:10 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.

January 30, 2006

The Emperor's Clothes

OK, I'll just get this second post in under the wire if I'm lucky. And I wouldn't even bother were it not for the fact that I think the state of academia is important to the emergence of a New Liberalism (in the classic anti-statist sense). A friend of mine at the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions posted the following link to an article in Inside Higher Education that's about the details of a rather smarmy movement. I mean you really have to keep your wits about you to suss out what these folks actually intend, which is the educational establishment equivalent of selling a bullet-to-the-head as a cure for migraines. Excerpting:
more...

Posted by: Demosophist at 11:31 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 588 words, total size 4 kb.

All The Mahomet That's Fit To Print

Via email from Patrick al-Kafir who found it at the blog-grandfather:

Zombietime's Mohammed image archive.

While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. The recent cartoons in Jyllands-Posten are nothing new; it's just that no other images of Mohammed have ever been so widely publicized.

Note the images purchased off the street in Iran.

In 1999.

Man, wait 'til the Islamofascists see this. It'll be boycott city, baby!

Posted by: Vinnie at 11:21 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.

So, I Ain't No Freakin' Demigod

Rusty wrote nine posts today. Count 'em... 9. Oy. Which makes him the Blogging Demigod or Buddha or something. (Not as though I can keep track of that metaphysical stuff, mind you.) About all I can manage, in the midst of the maelstrom, are a few anemic bullet points:

* What made Hamas a threat was the fact that they provided "social services," suggesting that if their capacity to do the same is subsidized by the EU, etc., they'll just get more radical and more threatening. I mean, if bears do you-know-what in the woods.

* Zawahiri is only pretending to be a lapdog of the Western Left. Every ounce of his understanding of Marxist Theory is secondhand, through Qutb... so he's basically a Dentist with a Hammer. But, of course, no one really gives a hoot because he's such a charming thug.

* No one really knows how the Iran Dilemma will be resolved, which suggests that everything is actually just fine. I'd worry if it appeared MSM weren't typically clueless.

* Alito kicks ass.

I'll nuance these themes later, and apologize for the fact that I'm so seldom present (in comparison to the Blogging Buddha).

Posted by: Demosophist at 10:16 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.

Alito Filibuster Defeated, 72-25

Despite semi-coherent bluster from Senator Teddy Kennedy (how can anyone from Massachusetts stand the embarrassment of being represented by this blivit?), the vote for cloture on debate of the Alito nomination has passed. Certainly, this will be much to the consternation of the Left's lunatic fringe, which spent the weekend harrassing Senators in an attempt to garner support for a filibuster.

I'll let Cartman express my feelings to the moonbats.

Cartman: Yes! Yesss!! Oh, let me taste your tears, Libs! Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 07:36 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Final vote due soon - my 72-28 looking gooooood!

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:39 PM (3aakz)

2 You're a genius, hondo!

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 07:45 PM (rUyw4)

3 Dunno, hondo, several of the Dems said that they would vote for cloture, but against confirmation.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 30, 2006 07:54 PM (RHG+K)

4 Its not the final actual vote yet - never get ahead of yourself - there's always room for Murphy's Law.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 08:01 PM (3aakz)

5 >>>"Dunno, hondo, several of the Dems said that they would vote for cloture, but against confirmation." "Several" aint gonna cut it. Alito's as good as in. I was over at Kos a few hours ago "tasting" their tears. So sweeeet!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 08:11 PM (8e/V4)

6 I don't see why you'd want to ban this moron. He's our best argument against muslim immigration. You should keep him around as exhibit A.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 08:58 PM (8e/V4)

7 >>>"I'm Catholic" That's a frightening thought. Ok, so why are you posting that garbage here? There are a billion blogs on the net, why are you haunting this one? Just curious.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 10:06 PM (8e/V4)

8 Is this Allito thing still all about abortion? I mean, they aren't even taking it away, they just want the children to have their parents consent. My god, you can't even get a beer or a pack of cigs at 17...why should you be able to decide on a major medical procedure? And while I'm on the subject...how come there's always like a million lesbians in front of abortion clinics...this has nothing to do with you...don't get me wrong...I like lesbians...but, you sleep with other women...that's the part I like!

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 10:23 PM (EKMxC)

9 The boat to political irrelevancy is boarding, and the libtards are stampeding the gangplank. These are good time.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 10:56 PM (0yYS2)

10 I'm changing my final guess to 61-39. Hondo, you underestimate these ideologues on the left side of the aisle. Did anyone catch Kennedy blowing a gasket on the senate floor yesterday? It was drama at its acme. And Dingy Harry spent 20 minutes browbeating Bush making him sound worse than Foulmood Almondjeans and preaching doom and gloom. You could almost see black clouds and lightning forming over his head. Who needs soap operas when we have CSPAN?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 05:29 AM (YudAC)

11 You smell that? Do you smell that? ...Liberal tears, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of Liberal tears in the morning. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole Senate. Smelled like... VICTORY. ...

Posted by: Brad at January 31, 2006 08:15 AM (BJYNn)

12 Good times, good times.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:10 AM (0yYS2)

13 ioezhab exiuqsjiuo

Posted by: Evan at February 27, 2006 07:33 PM (RaXUk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: Endorsed By Jimmy Carter Edition

******FATWAS ISSUED******

Caption this photo of ~~Ham Ass~~ Hamas "political leader" Khaleed Said Salaam Shaheed Abdul ibn Fahd Derka Derka Mohammed Jihad Smith giving a speech to someone somewhere:

IMPORTANT NOTE: Entries containing the words "death," "to," or "Israel" will be automatically disqualified. C'mon peeps, there has to some challenge to this.

Fatwas will be issued when Mr. Venom submits an entry complaining that no fatwas have been issued.

Or Monday evening, before the new episode of 24, of course.

Fatwas issued! Man, this gets harder every week. These Islamotards are great for caption contests, eh wot?

Double fatwa with cheese, super-sized with a diet Coke:

"And then we're going to Syria, and we're going to Lebanon, and we're going to Yemen. Yeeeeaaaaarrrrrrgggghhhh!" - Steven L.

Fatwas:

"We need one more couple for the Virginia Reel!" - J Rob

"OH MY GOD!!!...Its Godzillaaaaa!!!!!.....WUN!!! WUN!!! Wun For youre lives!!!" - Thanos35

"Arafat! Pull my finger!" - Leovinius

Honorable mention fatwa for Star Wars reference:

"That's not a moon, it's a space station!" - Lawhawk

Gratuitous honorable mention so he doesn't fling poo at his owners:

"I am number one!
Number two is on my other hand." - Spacemonkey

And speaking of fatwas, how about another posting of the Danish caricatures of Mohammed under the fold!

Go ahead, suckers, boycott me!! more...

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:04 PM | Comments (50) | Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.

Another Jill Carrol Hostage Video Emerges

jill.carroll.aljazeera.second.hostage.video.jpg UPDATE 2/09/06: Third Jill Carroll hostage video here.

Scroll through for updates or check the MAIN PAGE here or our pages dedicated exclusively to Jill Carroll for the latest news on Jill Carroll and other hostages in Iraq.
----------
Disturbing news that al Jazeera has released yet another Jill Carroll video. This time, the massogonistic terrorists force Ms. Carroll to cover her head. Sickening.

UPDATE: While we continue to search for the unedited video, you can see the al Jazeera broadcast here (see right side of screen). As further evidence of al Jazeera's objectively pro-terrorist stance, anti-Americanism, and lies, earlier reports by the station itself that no audio were shown are not true. Al Jazeera does let this bit of audio slip by in the background:

their own government [inaudible] Iraq...let these people go home to their families

Undoubtedly a reference to the female Iraqi prisoners.

Roy Hallums, a hostage liberated by U.S. troops, related that when his terrorist captors wanted him to cry on his video, they first beat him. They said they wanted his tears to look 'believable'.

We pray for Jill Carroll's immediate release and for divine retribution to visit her captors. Hopefully in the form of the unpleasent end of an M16.

Al Jazeera:

Jill Carroll, the kidnapped US journalist, has appeared in a new video on Aljazeera, weeping and appealing for the release of women Iraqi prisoners.
The video, aired by Aljazeera on Monday, shows Carroll wearing a veil and weeping.

The video had no sound, but Aljazeera said she appealed for the release of women Iraqi prisoners. [Ed note: this is a deliberate falsehood on al Jazeera's part. Al Jazeera edited out most of Jill Carroll's pleas, but not a bit asking for the release of female prisoners]
Carroll is visibly crying in the video and wears a veil as she speaks to the camera. The footage has a time signature with the date 28 January.

Aljazeera's newscaster said in the video Carroll appeals to the US military and the Iraqi Interior Ministry to release all women in their prisons and that this "would help in winning her release".

More information and background about the Jill Carroll hostage situation can be found here.

UPDATE: Come to think of it, this is VERY good news. Jill Carroll's captors had given the U.S. a 72 hour deadline to release female prisoners in Iraq. That deadline expired 8 days before this film was time stamped. While it is still possible that her life is being threatened, the fact that they've let at least two deadlines pass without (apparently) harming her is a sign that perhaps their threats are idle.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:37 PM | Comments (74) | Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I'm not to sure what to make of the veil, she has in the past worn them willingly: http://www.here-now.org/content/2006/01/10/0110reporter100.jpg You know the 'radical' Islam types though, they were probably worried her hairstyle would give them a woody. Let's hope for her safe return.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 03:43 PM (CcXvt)

2 Amen Rusty, the poor woman. Those bastards have not one ounce of humanity.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:44 PM (D3+20)

3 So why does al-jazeera leave out the sound? Seems like an effort to soften the video to me. Can any one else think of a reason her sobs were left out other than to show the terrorists slime in the best possible light.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (D3+20)

4 I wonder what the ACLU has to say about this?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 03:49 PM (3OPZt)

5 They stopped running the sound shortly after the Polish hostage crisis. Remember that? The Arab world was outraged that al Jazeera ran that woman's sobs on the air. It made Muslims look like savages. Imagine that.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 03:53 PM (JQjhA)

6 Savages indeed.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:03 PM (D3+20)

7 Seems like you should learn your lesson, but then again idiots never learn from their lesson. Free the Muslims all around the world.

Posted by: Abdul Wali at January 30, 2006 04:18 PM (lDj8F)

8 "Let me put it this way, you wimp: I DARE YOU to kill her!" -- Danny DeVito, "Ruthless People" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091877/

Posted by: mojo at January 30, 2006 04:20 PM (U9foz)

9 The scary thing about Abdul Wali, is that he is in Lutton, U.K. You'd expect this kind of reaction from Saudi Arabia, but not a Briton. Traitor.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 04:23 PM (JQjhA)

10 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up.

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (tdhAh)

11 Yes, free those Muslims who think for themselves and enslave them in the idology of jihad and salafacism. They should only think and feel what the prophet who married a nine-year old girl says for them to think. That will surely improve their lot in life.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (rUyw4)

12 Abdul Wali, the NSA read your Hotmail.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 04:36 PM (CcXvt)

13 We should all email him to be sure he qualifies.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:37 PM (D3+20)

14 Even with the sound off, the impact of those images is not diminished. I pray that she makes it out unharmed. I also pray that her captors, the people who Abdul Wali holds in such high esteem are quickly taken into custody, using mops, buckets and a pressure washer or two. Unfortunately there is no shortage of Abdul-esque types polluting the UK and elsewhere with their presence.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 04:48 PM (+JGk2)

15 Ah but the Sith Master Paduan Jawa is on the case. You are banned so go away. M came back

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:49 PM (D3+20)

16 Hey, Abdul Wali. Mohammad is the false prophet and Allah is his Beast. See you in hell.

Posted by: MandM at January 30, 2006 04:50 PM (/lpvu)

17 He will keep this up till his hands are too sticky - just ignore - he will past.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:59 PM (3aakz)

18 This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation).

Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM (BNseL)

19 Weren't the Iraqi women prisoners released last weekend as scheduled? Or at least a number of them?

Posted by: MOG at January 30, 2006 05:16 PM (ClGDj)

20 MOG, Five of a total of eight were released. Which seems strange that in a country of 25 million only 3 women would have ties to the insurgency.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:17 PM (JQjhA)

21 Deliberately editing out the sound! If that isn't the most blatant and amaturish form of tampering I've seen in a long time - then I don't know what is. So, is it going to be available to the MSM unedited? Does the MSM have any comment on this piece of work on the part of their esteemed fellow journalists?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:25 PM (3aakz)

22 Are those hands sticky yet?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:30 PM (3aakz)

23 MikeeUSA: Do you have anger issues?

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 05:36 PM (tdhAh)

24 Jesusland Joe, E-mail me when you get a chance. Rusty.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:48 PM (JQjhA)

25 Look at her. She's all dhimmified. But hey, it doesn't compare to "Pat Robertson".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:11 PM (8e/V4)

26 Start handing out death sentences to all of the terrorists in custody. Start up their trials and upon finding them guilty of terrorism, SENTENCE THEM TO DEATH AND PUBLICLY EXECUTE THEM! KILL THEM ALL DAMN IT!

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 06:16 PM (bQ3vG)

27 It shouldn't be long now before muslims start disappearing in civilized countries. Of course then, they'll scream about their rights and such. We're just going to have to exterminate them like the vermin they are.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:24 PM (0yYS2)

28 MikeeUSA, what a complete moron you are.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 06:30 PM (YudAC)

29 Mikee, so you're using a fake IP. WOW! you must be so impressed with yourself. moron.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:36 PM (8e/V4)

30 Mikee you are just another in a long line of fools; I see you are the moron for January. This hostage taking has to stop. I wonder why we can't plant trained people with tracking devices under their skin to be kidnapped, then send in the troops. It might take a while but after wiping out a few insurgent cells the muslims would probably turn chicken and lessen their attempts at abducting westerners.

Posted by: Jester at January 30, 2006 06:48 PM (QKZX5)

31 jill carroll is in real danger. her pain socks me right in the heart. hellums may have been beaten to induce tears, i fear carroll has been raped. a word about the missing audio though. is it possible that this is the one thing that al jazeera will cooperate with the authorities on? my understanding is that this is standard procedure for hostage situations to reduce false leads and controll for misinfo. al jazeera may be doing this not nessesarily at the u.s.'s request, but at the request of the quatar government, who have divided loyalties. another point, i don't believe their threats are idle. they may mke her execution part of the jihadist response to the sotu or are otherwise hoping to affix added signifigance to it. the taking of a woman and using her captivity to demand the release of women prisoners seems to me to be an act of premeditated symbolism. the "peace" activists in iraq, i'm certain, are advising them well also, improbulus maximus does not speak for me any more than a robert scheer or a cindy sheehan, and i reject his creepy, eliminationist reaction in the strongest terms.

Posted by: jummy at January 30, 2006 06:54 PM (kGfOr)

32 It's very sad. My understanding is that the woman is a liberal and was in Iraq reporting from basically an anti-American perspective. What we're seeing, sadly, is the reality of a liberal getting her wake-up call to the reality of the world. The world is not a place of sweetness and light where all cultures are equal and everything is relative and "context" is all-important. These Muslims couldn't care less about context and relativity and equality. They just want to saw off the heads of people who don't submit to them. And this poor liberal woman is finding this out the hard way. God Bless and keep her, I hope she is delivered to safety.

Posted by: MarkJ at January 30, 2006 07:23 PM (HECm6)

33 MikeeUSA going bye bye please stand by......

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 07:38 PM (D3+20)

34 Stinky hands are the devil's mono-playground.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:41 PM (3aakz)

35 Do some research about an Eyptian hostage who escaped after his hostage video was filmed. He claimed that a stringer who worked with Al Jazeera helped direct the hostage video prior to its filming. It might just be one of the many rumors floating around Iraq, but on two other occasions Al Jazeera was accused of paying protesters to riot against Americans, and another time they interviewed militants trucked in to an IED bombing to rail against Americans while the Iraq who lived in the house two doors down claimed he had never seen them before. The sad fact is, without the public distribution outlet Al Jazeera provides terrorists, many of these kidnappings would either not take place, or would be settled financially in a matter of days.

Posted by: Anon at January 30, 2006 07:57 PM (UxviT)

36 Rusty, I sent you an e-mail at 6:00pm. Have not heard from you yet. It's under heat Aaron.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 10:16 PM (rUyw4)

37 I truly hope Jill is safe and everything is OK. But, I hate myself when I say it, but, I just get the strongest feeling someone is trying to sell me a newspaper...

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 10:36 PM (EKMxC)

38 Why don't we just start knocking off those precious Iraqi women terrorists in our custody, unless they let her free? We should start our videos by having the Iraqi detainees eating bacon or something. Filthy savages, with their backward culture, such as it is.

Posted by: benno at January 30, 2006 10:40 PM (tXsgc)

39 I'm not sure I'm ready to agree with offing unarmed women...but, I like the eating bacon video idea! How about Clinton, a cigar, a veiled muslim chick eating bacon?

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:13 PM (EKMxC)

40 With the caption "I never porked that woman"

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:16 PM (EKMxC)

41 I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified. This would in no way justify the terrorists' tactics, but would explain their position. I pray for the release of Jill and the release of all unjustly imprisoned people.

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:29 PM (eLgNA)

42 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up. Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM She wasn't on the terrorists' side. She was on the side of honest law abiding Iraqis that want freedom. GD it! This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation). Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM seeker, you sound like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. http://www.president.ir/eng/

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:42 PM (eLgNA)

43 Jason Of course the US & the Iraqi govt are unjustly imprisoning Iraqi women! For what reason? - none of course - but don't put it past those evil Americans to be using them for comfort girlees! This will of course 'explain" the actions of the "alleged" terrorists to you for your satisfaction. Clearly America has commited a crime against islam and must pay - so - sorry Jill Carrol - you are available. Jason can now feel better - and fake his concern and blame your death on America. BTW Jason - There is now a new job opening for a journalist in Iraq - you might like it - you write well enough - get out - meet the people - maybe come to understand them - get the truth out about the evil American Occupation. I'm sure they will welcome you with open arms.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:10 AM (3aakz)

44 ... and a videocamera.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:12 AM (3aakz)

45 "I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified." You don't really believe the kidnappers care one whit why these women are being detained - do you?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 05:41 AM (YudAC)

46 The only difference between martyrdom and suicide bombers (or as i like to refer to them 'murderers for mohammed') is the press coverage.

Posted by: ibiubu at January 31, 2006 06:24 AM (qqbUc)

47 RE: Jill Carroll There's an old saying that a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. If she makes it out alive, I wonder what she'll think of the poor widdle terrorists, er, freedom fighters. God grant that she is returned home safely.

Posted by: docjim505 at January 31, 2006 09:30 AM (MC8cP)

48 Has anyone researched her writing to determine who's side she's actually on?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:09 AM (0yYS2)

49 I'll bet my testicles that she'll be released and go on to praise her kidnappers as perfect gentlemen. She might even pull a Yvonna and convert. She was wayyyy to sympathetic to them to assume she's actually being held against her will.

Posted by: Mus Zibii at January 31, 2006 12:18 PM (JG5R3)

50 Although I don't agree with the Muslim religion, i don't liken to hear Christians and/or Americans saying "The Muslims this.." and "The Muslims that.." We don't have to agree to get along and show love to one another, and I am sure there are plenty of Muslims who agree. If not, well ok then, but I am going to do what Jesus commanded, which is love one another. He didn't say, "unless they are Muslim." Pray for these men to have mercy on Jill. If they don't, pray for her soul to be united with the Lord in Heaven. Hey if you disagree-that is fine with me...

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:17 PM (5838u)

51 Hey RobbieKeane68: why don't you go preach those views of yours in Saudi Arabia?

Posted by: dave at January 31, 2006 01:24 PM (CcXvt)

52 Ok, Dave...I'm not much of a preacher, but why is it that having a view is "preaching"? Just like I can have a viewpoint so can anyone else-- I am just saying that hope and peace lies in loving each other. If "over there" I would be beheaded for saying such a crazy thing, then at least I am at peace with how God would feel about it--I still have my hope and peace regardless of what anyone else says or does. Arguing about it, whether with words or with war, is not effective. If love is not effective here on earth, then, OK!

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:40 PM (5838u)

53 robbie Nice try at sentimentality - doesn't work given your phony link - safe to assume your phony too - and looking to be coyly provacative with a holier than thou approach.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:47 PM (3aakz)

54 I'M holier than THOU? interesting, but all yours nonetheless. I wouldn't feel so safe in assuming anything. no one is holier than anyone except God, not even you--that is my point about these folks on here going on about "the muslims" when it is not their place to judge or make assumptions..excuse me for having such an outrageous opinion, hondo! what do you mean my link is fake-i didn't even add my link so how can it be fake?

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:58 PM (5838u)

55 If you want to drop me a line why don't you write me at {deleted} ...that should be where my "link" takes you..

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:13 PM (5838u)

56 Robbie- Dont' give out your addy. And don't worry about them saying you have a fake link. I don't understand much about ISP's and such, but there is a cerain kind that appears to be fake because it changes. Roams, so to speak. Don't get caught up in defending yourself. Make your statement, and let the chips fall.

Posted by: Righty-Tighty at January 31, 2006 02:32 PM (7a66P)

57 ok, R-T-thanks-yeah, i didn't realize about the link thing either-never has come up before. I don't mind anyone writing me- it's not like I give out any of my real info on the net anyway for safety reasons...oh, or that i am so fake! ha.it's cool.

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:36 PM (5838u)

58 But you so obviously are.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 06:10 PM (3aakz)

59 I was very saddened to see Jill crying and suffering in her video. It is good to see that she is still alive. I hope and pray for her safe release to her family. I know the devastation they are feeling with the uncertainty of their sweet Jill. Free Jill and all the hostages in Iraq, Susan new website from Carrie Hallums Cooper hostagefamilymatters.com

Posted by: Susan Hallums at January 31, 2006 07:17 PM (OjS5b)

60 fuck it. fry them faggots. fuck em all

Posted by: poppa at January 31, 2006 08:24 PM (CEvk8)

61 Her writings, her website, indicate she went there to 'crusade' for the 'Iraqi people'... Her sister ran a web site calling her Â“Lady of ArabiaÂ” which suggests Lawrence of Arabia who was well known for his romantic illusions. I ask you... does this quote also reflect a bit of a 'martyr' complex? Â“There are more lucrative ways to work and faster ways to advance a career,Â” she wrote in March 2005 for the American Journalism Review. Â“But just as athletes do it for love of the game, freelancers in Iraq seem to do it for love of the story.Â” She wrote freelance for the Christian Science Monitor articles that were biased towards the 'worsening' situation: Â“The anger and violence have only gotten worse sinceÂ” April 2004, she wrote in AJR, and she specifically mentioned kidnapping as a threat. Like all the collaborators she actively participates and in so doing further reinforces her bona fides guaranteeing her eventual release. But just like previous staged 'events' she did seem to make it pretty easy: Carroll had reportedly been there to interview Adnan al-Dulaimi, the leader of the Iraqi Accordance Front, a Sunni political party. He wasnÂ’t there and she left after waiting between 20 and 30 minutes. According to the driver and witnesses, the gunmen forced the driver to stop, then pulled him out of the car, piled in and drove away with Carroll and her translator, Allan Enwiyah, 32. Â“All together, it didn't take 10 seconds,Â” Carroll's driver told the Washington Post Monday night. Later Saturday, Enwiyah was found dead on the side of a road in Adel, the neighborhood where they were taken. Anybody want to talk about Sunni leaks? This 'abduction' was hushed up because the newsies themselves decided they might be able to 'negotiate'. Or was that collaborate? She will pass the 'Islamic Witch Test' as only the innocent are burned. The guilty are released to burn us...

Posted by: DANEgerus at February 01, 2006 11:33 PM (EcDu5)

62 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: kc at February 06, 2006 02:10 PM (6dAeG)

63 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: c at February 06, 2006 02:11 PM (6dAeG)

64 The problems in the mideast started way before the U.S. From the crusades, to the Abassids, to the Ottoman Turks, WW1 and the breaking of the region into spheres of influence, the U.S. action is of little consequence. The issues run way further than Al Qaida and Iraq...it's a distrust of occupation and colonialism, and this is identified with the West. Few countries in the region accept the existence of Israel, and they hate America for supporting it. (Thanks to Britain and France in their colonial actions). Our military will not transform the region, and Jill Carroll is imply a pawn being used by cowards who believe they are men by kidnapping a woman. We should take care of the terrorists, and then leave for good. Jill Carroll is an American, we should all hope for her release, with the left and right crap aside.

Posted by: Chris at February 07, 2006 03:43 PM (ZVpQt)

65 The prophet has declared this slaves vagina to be used for allah. she is a sex whore. stop saying that liberals dont need to be slaves to allah.

Posted by: waheed at February 08, 2006 03:35 AM (KxPKJ)

66 THIS WHOLE THING IS A SCAM.. SHE IS JUST TRYNG TO GET A MOVIE AND A BOOK DEAL... IF SHE WAS REALLY CAPTURED THEY WOULD OF KILLED HER ALREADY... EITHER KILL HER OR STOP TALKING ABOUT IT... SHE DOESNT SEEM TO WORRIED ABOUT THE WHOLE THING... KILL ALL ARABS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:02 AM (t8I9m)

67 SHE COULD EASILY HAVE ARABS OVER THERE SET THIS WHOLE TV THING UP AND TAPE IT WITH NO INTENTIONS ON KILLING HER JUST TO MAKE HER FAMOUS AND GAIN MILLIONS FROM HER STORY WHEN THEY FINALLY RELEASE HER.... HER HEAD WAS SUPPOSE TO BE CUT OFF A MONTH AGO.. WHY IS HER HEAD STILL ATTACHED TO HER SHOULDERS???? WHY???

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:05 AM (t8I9m)

68 Maybe my eyes are worse than I thought - but in looking at the side by side photos on today's CNN homepage, the two women do not look the same. Look closely at the nose on each of them. Also, the one on the right looks younger. Does anyone else notice that?

Posted by: Marilyn at February 09, 2006 10:53 PM (Y93ys)

69 KILL HER ALREADY... BET THEY WONT CAUSE ITS A SCAM... HOW MANY DEADLINES DO YOU GIVE THE UNITED STATES... SUCH BULLSHIT.. CHOP HER HEAD OFF NOW!!!!! AMERICA IS FULL OF IDIOTS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 10, 2006 03:06 PM (t8I9m)

70 I think that all you muslims are shit. how can you take a woman for a hostage? i cant wait intill we kill you all. rest in peace jill, for having hope.

Posted by: tha usa at February 11, 2006 06:03 PM (QtVWV)

71 Moslems kill each other over a cartoon but when a human being is beheaded not a word is said against it!! Why is the ONE who says you get 42 Virgins when you die for Allah ; Hiding out!! Osama Bin Laden to be specific!! That would show somekind of humanity if they released Jill Carroll!!

Posted by: Garryowen at February 16, 2006 12:07 AM (406FR)

72 That's plain insane. If you think that killing all muslims is the cure---you're an idiot. Jill Carroll is taking the punishment for people like you. Oh, and to the captors....grow some balls. Kidnapping a cute little american girl really isn't that intimidating dumbasses. Let her go.

Posted by: Mikey Fresh at February 16, 2006 11:21 AM (fFre4)

73 WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE THAT WOULD KIDNAP SOMEONE,ESPECIALLY A WOMAN,AND THREATEN TO KILL HER????? SHE WAS THERE TO TELL A FAIR STORY.THERE IS NO WAY SHE CAN DO IT WHEN SHE'S DEAD!!!! TO HER CAPTERS: YOU PEOPLE HAVE AN AGENDA,FINE.BUT, YOU WILL COME ACROSS AS COWARDS,NOT HEROS,IF YOU HARM HER.YOU DON'T HAVE THE BALLS TO "F" WITH OUR MARINES,DO YOU? THEY WOULD PUT A BOOT SO FAR UP YOUR ASS YOU'D BE CHEWING LEATHER!!!!LET HER GO !!!DON'T MAKE THE WHOLE U.S. COME AND "F" YOU UP!!!! JAMES WARREN PROUD AMERICAN....

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:42 PM (4nZcu)

74 LET HER GO,YOU COWARDS!!!!!!

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:45 PM (4nZcu)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Danish Paper Caves to Islamic Fascists, Apologizes

The newspaper which carried the originally 'offensive' cartoons has caved. My feeling is that the Danes will never cave. So, continue to buy your Danish pastries, beers, and porn. I'd lay off purchasing the latest copy of Jyllands-Posten, though.

Via Is Full of Crap this from JPOST:

A Danish newspaper on Monday issued an apology to the world's Muslims for publishing caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that sparked a furor in the Islamic world.
The drawings "were not in violation of Danish law but have undoubtedly offended many Muslims, which we would like to apologize for," the Jyllands-Posten's editor-in-chief Carsten Juste said in a statement posted on the paper's Web site.

Meanwhile the cyber jihad continues with numerous websites that have defended Danish freedom of expression suffering under Denial of Service Attacks.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:25 PM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.

1 DDOS? *heh* Not here, pal. Unless Allah can saturate 30+ gigabits with advanced DDOS defenses. I'm Jewish. I'm Texan. I'm Zionist. They already want me dead.

Posted by: Laurence Simon at January 30, 2006 03:31 PM (uBCxH)

2 So why are we not running this cartoon on all our blogs?

Posted by: Filthy Allah at January 30, 2006 03:35 PM (5ceWd)

3 Run the cartoon, Rusty. All day, all night, all the time. Piss on the pedophile prophet. I'm sick of their crap.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 03:36 PM (rUyw4)

4 Note the carefully worded response. They didn't apologize for the cartoons, but they apologized for offending Muslims who were outraged by the cartoons. Since when have we had to apologize for offending people?

Posted by: Chad Evans at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (+DXHJ)

5 Jyllands Posten may have apologised, but the citizens have not/will not. As a matter of fact, 'free speech' advocates are resisting in many creative ways . . .see http://viking-observer.blogspot.com/2006/01/danish-counter-attacks.html

Posted by: heroyalwhyness at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (XU9K/)

6 We stand in solidarity with the Danish people and linked to the post you mention here http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/154563.php

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 03:55 PM (JQjhA)

7 I ran it on mine and here, Filthy.

Posted by: Vinnie at January 30, 2006 04:25 PM (f289O)

8 And you wonder why I sit back and watch on this one.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:34 PM (3aakz)

9 "Going down! Going down, down, down, down" - whoa! and I gave them a week! Let's revisit this story in a couple of days (or hours).

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:03 PM (3aakz)

10 I think IÂ’m with Hondo on this one. IÂ’m not from Missouri, but I gotta be showed. Like I said, I would support the Danes if they stood up for themselves. But the paper caving in so early in this struggle is not good news. Rather it reinforces the image I have of a culture that will not stand up for itself because of political correctness. That same paper would run a derogatory cartoon about our President and would never, never apologize. IÂ’m afraid anyone leading this lefty crew of Europeans in the charge is going to look behind himself and find that he is alone. I hope IÂ’m wrong, but I need to see them do a little more fighting for Denmark.

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM (3OPZt)

11 TBAC love americans. We didnÃ‚Â´t even know we had it in us... Or that you had it in you. So thanks for the support guys. Cheers!

Posted by: TCAB at January 30, 2006 05:24 PM (dgZEx)

12 What support? What are you talking about? Who the F*** are you?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:29 PM (3aakz)

13 They didn't completely cave in. What they said is they were sorry for offending Muslims, they never apologised for publishing the cartoons.

Posted by: jonny at January 30, 2006 05:30 PM (nytWC)

14 What time is it?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:37 PM (3aakz)

15 Prayer time for Danes?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 05:53 PM (3OPZt)

16 It's time for a whuppin.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:26 PM (0yYS2)

17 Thanks for posting on this topic. The Danish newspaper which published the original cartoons has been forced to apologize. The Brussels Journal blog which has led the reporting of this attack on free speech is now receiving threats. Given the state of free speech in Europe as evidenced by the Italian "prove Christ existed" case, I expect Brussels Journal to be forced to remove the cartoons and their reporting. To guard against that possibility, I have reposted the cartoons and the Brussels Journal reporting thread on my blog. I urge all bloggers who care about free speech to do the same. See Farenheit 451 Alert

Posted by: pbswatcher at January 30, 2006 06:43 PM (z32ww)

18 Maxie Whup who? Muslims or Danes? Watch the show - get a beer (American) and some popcorn.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 06:50 PM (3aakz)

19 From a letter from a Dane to Charles at LGF: If you know the story of the Muhammed cartoons, then you would know that the Jyllands-Posten has ALWAYS said it regretted offending muslims feelings. Todays Â“apologyÂ” simply says Â“weÂ’re sorry for hurting your feelingsÂ”, but they do not apologize for publishing the cartoons. Your source is wrong in its understanding of what has happened. Here's a link to the entry: http://tinyurl.com/78b2v I don't think the paper caved over free speech at all: they were simply restating their position, (Nice blog, btw. I found it through LGF.)

Posted by: Anthony (Los Angeles) at January 30, 2006 07:52 PM (rqAqD)

20 This article from FrontPageMag says that a Pakistani Islamic party has put a price on the cartoonist's head. And here I was all set to make with the snark about how progressives were probably going to congratulate the mullahs for not issuing a Rushdie-style fatwa this time.

Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at January 30, 2006 09:47 PM (7U/tM)

21 I think some posters here have it correct... The "apology" was carefully worded... You know, "Dick Durbin Style", as in "I am sorry if I offended any of you who took offense."

Posted by: Son Of The Godfather at January 31, 2006 04:22 AM (maXzk)

22 I guarantee that in a year or two none of you will even remember this non-event. I have forgotten it already. So you can keep your freedom of speech and ram it up your religious asses. Not Interested.

Posted by: Not Interested at January 31, 2006 03:58 PM (uAF2Z)

23 These insulting cartoons were meant to emotionally harm Muslims, which they did and has made the racists/secular fundamentalists on this page happy. It was correct for Muslims to condemn and protest these filthy cartoons. Danes have forgotten manners and common sense. These cartoons have no connection to free speech and will make zero impact on Islam. The whole exercise is a complete waste of time and effort.

Posted by: Aamir Ali at February 01, 2006 11:56 AM (36qks)

24 These insulting cartoons were meant to emotionally harm Muslims, which they did and has made the racists/secular fundamentalists on this page happy. It was correct for Muslims to condemn and protest these filthy cartoons. Danes have forgotten manners and common sense. These cartoons have no connection to free speech and will make zero impact on Islam.

Posted by: Aamir Ali at February 01, 2006 11:56 AM (36qks)

25 I have been reading about these cartoons, but I haven't even been able to find them. Who cares what these people think about some idiot who ran a high fever in the desert and claims to have spoken to God. Poverty and dispare keep this people confused and clinging to a crude religion. We would all be safer and happier without the Koran!

Posted by: kent at February 02, 2006 07:52 PM (/1aP3)

26 Kent, You are so right!. Actually,I would say it a ittle less harshly...it's a tragedy that millions of people have been hoodwinked by Mohammed's game-playing , territory-conquering manipulations. He designed a new "revelation from God" to fit every new thing he personally felt like doing in his quest to seek revenge, and grab land. It's incredible that it has become a major religion, but Nazism was one too. They are actualy rather similar in nature. Mohammed cleary had copies of Jewish and Christian writings, and he obviously repeated/edited them, twisting them to his own self-serving ends. All people would indeed be better off without the Koran , and no one is helped by pretending to be open-minded about it in order not to offend.

Posted by: John at February 03, 2006 08:30 PM (17lnq)

27 Listen you political noobs, here's the distilled ejaculate: There have always been Muslim extremists, just like there have always been Christian extremists. If you gave Pat Robertson $1 billion in arms per year and told him to launch a holy war against all non-christian invaders, you'd end up with a spreading plague of Pat Robertson deciphals armed to the teeth, killing anyone who didn't agree with them or slighted them, spreading their form of totalitarian religious facism (all the while believing more and more that God must be with them since their gains are ever increasing) and keeping moderate Christians (95%)stomped down with intimidation and threats. So what's your point, Wart? Hello! This is EXACTLY what we did in Afghanistan. The CIA, through Pakistan, directly supported the overthrow of the Russian puppet government in Kaboool via huge shipments of arms to whom? Namby-pambi Afghani poppy farmers? No, dumbass, by supporting the extremist jihadis that came from all corners of the globe to kill infidel Rooskies. They networked. They trained at training camps using CIA help. They recruited with powerful messages and promises of virgins (I personally fucked all the virgins in heaven and gave them herpes, so jihadis are all dying for nothing). Then the raggedy Arab bastards won and drove Ivan out of the house! Yes, Allah is great, we won! Look what I said...Allah is great. Not the USA is great for supplying us with arms...Allah supplied us with arms. This is an important distinction, and we were very willing to go along with that Arab delusion in our attempt to camoflage from Russia who was supplying the arms. So, now you've got all these way extreme jihadis from around the planet with noting to do, all networked up, CIA trained and armed to the teeth. Mix well with a helping of Osama and Ayman who have been kicked out of every Arab country that wasn't prepared to accept their brand of extremism, and what do you have? Two sides of the fire triangle, dumbass. And then, what did the USA do? Got pissed off at Pakistan for nuclear arms proliferation and cut off all military and most economic aid. This highly insulted the Arab jihadists. Then we flat left Afghanistan with no government, no aid, no stabilizing force. Thanks Bill Clinton, you cheating cum stain. And guess what, we continued to buy arms for jihadis for several years after the Rooskies left! So ask yourself, what did we win? Well, I doubt that the USSR would have tumbled as soon without getting wiped out in Afghanistan. They still would have fallen as their military spending was even more unsustainable than ours. But now we have jihadis everywhere. What is a mother to do? The answer isn't to hate Muslims and the Koran, although I must say the Sharia law is unsustainable for a modern culture and is by and large a disservice to Islam. 90% of Muslims live in fear of the 10% of extremists, just like if Pat Robertson thugs ruled the Christian world. The Muslim extremists really do believe that they are right, and that anything short of Taliban or Wahabi lifestyle anywhere on the planet is unacceptable. Anywhere. They will call anyone, even fellow Muslims "infidels" if they don't practice the most extreme form of Mullah Omar branded whackoism. Now, in all fairness, we have supported oppressive, elitist, totalitarian, nepotistic Arab oil governments forever. This has done nothing but make the poor in these countries bitter at us, the ones stealing their natural resources and propping up their abusive, oppressive and repressive governments. These disenfranchised A-rab poor are ripe pickings for Wahabi-Talibani-Whackos. "So what is the solution, Oh Well-Read and Wise Uncle Wart? Please tell us what to do so we don't have to think for ourselves." The effort must be manifold my dear, lazy ignoramuses. 1. Get going on an energy policy that will make totalitarian A-rab governments less important to prop-up. Yes fatass, this means you will not be driving that SUV, that you will pay 15% more for an Energy Star home, and we will be burning sawgrass and corn ethanol in our tanks. All along, apply continuous pressure for fair and just elections in oil rich Arab nations while gradually removing our reason for having to prop them up, even if they refuse to change. 2. Fix the Isreal/Palestine problem. Of course, that is not possible with the current Hammas. But eventually Isreal will have to cede most of their West Bank settlements and give up on owning Jerusalem. Jerusalem must become a triumverate Christian, Jewish and Muslim city. 3. Work to assist the disenfranchised in the Muslim world and give them the tools and education they need to succeed or at least not be desperately poor. This is gonna be tough if the A-rab governments aren't changing in unison. 4. Propaganda. We don't use it enough or properly. 5. Eliminate maddrasses everywhere through support for education. The only book used in many of these schools is the Koran, and memorizing all 6666 lines of it is all many of them do-along with preaching extremism and intolerance. No longer will it be legal for male children to only get a madrass education in places like Pakistan. 6. Spies and intelligence. OMG. We are months to years behind in translating Arab intercepts, and have almost no spies in the Muslim world. We need these people to help us prevent extremist flare ups and identify and locate extremist Muslim leaders and 7. Kill them. Yes. Bloody and inhumane, but letting them live to terrorize is even worse.

Posted by: Rectal_Wart at February 06, 2006 09:58 PM (1iDKs)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

215kb generated in CPU 0.1361, elapsed 0.3287 seconds.
136 queries taking 0.2799 seconds, 615 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 29016
Files: 102
Bytes: 527.6M
CPU Time: 47:03
Queries: 3238019

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76631

Feeds

January 31, 2006

January 30, 2006

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds